vovafat.blogg.se

Ambiguous reflection definition
Ambiguous reflection definition












ambiguous reflection definition

I've emailed a private mailing list which the C# team reads - I'll update this answer or add a new one when I hear back. Enumerable.Where) it works fine with the extern alias. If you change it to not try to use an extension method (i.e. (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) Var result = names.Where(x => x.Length > 1) ģ) Compile Test.cs specifying the extern alias: csc Test.cs /r:BadLinq.dll /r:SystemCore=Įxtension method 'Where' accepting a first argument of type Ambiguous Loss Research, Theory, and Practice: Reflections After 9/11 This article contains an overview of three decades of research, theory development, and clinical application about ambiguous loss. Public static IEnumerable Where(this IEnumerable source,Ģ) Create Test.cs: extern alias SystemCore This isn't really an answer, but may provide an easier way for others to reproduce the issue (from the command-line - you could do it with two projects in Visual Studio if you want).ġ) Create BadLinq.cs and build it as BadLinq.dll: using The references are to ReSharper v4.1 DLL files installed in the default directroy in "C:\Program Files\JetBrains\ReSharper\v4.1\.". The substance of this space is immaterial: reflected light and non- specific reflected images define the boundaries of the interior spaces. If I missed something, please let me know. I changed the alias of System.Core to SystemCore, added the extern alias directive, but it still didn't work. I uploaded a sample program where I just imported the ReSharper DLL files I needed. Off the top of my head, you could call Type.GetMethods () which will return all methods, then see if you get more than one that matches the name: Type.GetMethods ().Where (m > m.Name 'MyMethodName').Count () > 1 (theres probably a more elegant way, and could be optimized a bit, but it would probably work. This way I could use the extensions provided by ReSharper DLL files. In the meanwhile, I "solved" the problem by removing references to System.Core. '(,ĮDIT: I tried the suggestion below, unfortunately without luck. I get the following error when trying to compile: How could I solve this? I would like to use the core LINQ extensions, and not the ones from ReSharper. When I edit the code, it creates an ambiguity between those extensions, so that I cannot use OrderBy, for instance. One of the assemblies (.dll) contains a System.Linq namespace, with a subset of extension methods already provided by System.Core. For this, I needed to reference several of ReSharper's assemblies.














Ambiguous reflection definition